D#8 HW#5 PEER REVIEW PROCESS

the Peer review process is always very interesting. I personally reviewed Jennifer and Rochelle’s drafts and I though they both were very good. Now that I read their documents I know that I have a lot of work to do on my own. There are many parts of my document that are incomplete. I will be working hard to get the project complete. I also decided to use students for the class as my usability testers. I think this will be beneficial to my project.

D#7HW#6 project 3 draft

A very rough rough draft
of project 3

usabilityreportdraft

D#8HW#3 Team Writing chapters 3 and 4

lack of project manager

I remember a time when you had a group project in a class in Biology 101 a few semesters ago. If our group appointed a project manager our lives would have been much easier. We were very disorganised and could not figure out how to solve the problems in the group. One of the group member did absolutely nothing and of course the other 4 members of the group had to compensate. I think that group projects are very hard to accomplish because there is always going to be someone in the group that doesn’t put in enough effort. If we appointed a team or project manager we would have been able to have one person in charge and fix the slacking off problem.

D#8HW#2 htw-tc compare/contrast

When i was reading three chapters from the Handbook of Technical Writing I noticed how they are closely related to Chapter 20. Both books discuss the writing of external and internal proposals. External proposals try to persuade people who are outside an organization. Internal proposals try to persuade people within an organization such as employees of a company.

Tc in the 21st century is a very long chapter but it contained a lot of necessary information.
HTW also contained a lot of necessary information but in a shorter and more condensed version

Both books gave actual examples of proposals which I also find helpful.