I would like to commend you for at least starting to put information of your usability report into a Word document form complete with the basic layout of the usability report that includes the GTU logo and Google Images logo as well. At least in laying out the document you have the outline done and you “just need to fill in the blanks” to complete it. The tasks of Project #3 then becomes much easier.
Main thing I see that you need to address is actually filling in the blanks a little more to provide me with more substance and depth to the document. Need to at least starting throwing your loose idea into the document for us to critique it so then you get some “outside eyes” on the document to provide you the feedback.
You are missing a lot of sections in your loose outline that you need to address quickly. If you upload a revised document with more blanks filled in I will be gladly to assist you in the review process.
• Do you have any unanswered questions after you finished reading the draft? What are they?
Not really
• What did you like about the draft? How/why did you like it? How might the author build on that section?
I liked that you used students and staff maybe include faculty too.
I liked the fact that you were just as behind as I am. It is nice to know that you aren’t the only one struggling to stay on task or put all the pieces together.
• What sections are confusing to you? How/why? Ask your classmates questions that would help you to make sense of the section.
• Where would you like to know more? Ask questions!
• Does the draft provide all the requested information listed in the assignment prompt? If not, what is it missing?
Quite a bit actually.
• Use the”Editing Proofreading Strategies” (http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/general/gl_edit.html) to focus on some content and structure elements. Try to give specific details and examples of how/why you would revise something.
• Use the same page to focus on some surface and style elements. Try to give specific details and examples of how/why you would revise something.
* Do you have any unanswered questions after you finished reading the draft? What are they?
None, that really pop out at me. I think that your draft looks like it’s on the right track.
* What did you like about the draft? How/why did you like it? How might the author build on that section?
Personally, I liked how you laid out your usability report in the Word document. I had done so before, but something went wonky with my doc file. But it’s nice to see that you took the time to do that. Also, I like the format you took with the sections that you had up.
* What sections are confusing to you? How/why? Ask your classmates questions that would help you to make sense of the section.
None of the sections were very confusing, there are just pieces that aren’t fully completed. It’s on the right track though!
* Where would you like to know more? Ask questions!
I would like to know more about your usability team, it looks like an interesting group.
* Does the draft provide all the requested information listed in the assignment prompt? If not, what is it missing?
I think all of the sections from the prompt are clearly listed.
* Use the”Editing Proofreading Strategies” (http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/general/gl_edit.html) to focus on some content and structure elements. Try to give specific details and examples of how/why you would revise something.
* Use the same page to focus on some surface and style elements. Try to give specific details and examples of how/why you would revise something.
I think with everyone’s drafts we just need to revise and rework stuff. Everything looks good here, but with some editing it could end up great! Good luck with project 3!
• Do you have any unanswered questions after you finished reading the draft? What are they?
Everything seems good to me and I don’t have any questions.
• What did you like about the draft? How/why did you like it? How might the author build on that section?
In your draft the part that stood out to me was the table of contents because in my draft I didn’t have a table of contents and I liked your table of contents.
• What sections are confusing to you? How/why?
There wasn’t that much information therefore it wasn’t that confusing.
• Where would you like to know more? Ask questions!
I would like to see the final draft so there are not that many blank pages.
• Does the draft provide all the requested information listed in the assignment prompt? If not, what is it missing?
It is missing some information and those pages are blank
• Use the”Editing Proofreading Strategies” (http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/general/gl_edit.html) to focus on some content and structure elements. Try to give specific details and examples of how/why you would revise something.
There isn’t that much information to proofread and edit, and the information provide does not need any editing.
• Use the same page to focus on some surface and style elements. Try to give specific details and examples of how/why you would revise something.
There is no need for any details for revising
I would like to commend you for at least starting to put information of your usability report into a Word document form complete with the basic layout of the usability report that includes the GTU logo and Google Images logo as well. At least in laying out the document you have the outline done and you “just need to fill in the blanks” to complete it. The tasks of Project #3 then becomes much easier.
Main thing I see that you need to address is actually filling in the blanks a little more to provide me with more substance and depth to the document. Need to at least starting throwing your loose idea into the document for us to critique it so then you get some “outside eyes” on the document to provide you the feedback.
You are missing a lot of sections in your loose outline that you need to address quickly. If you upload a revised document with more blanks filled in I will be gladly to assist you in the review process.
• Do you have any unanswered questions after you finished reading the draft? What are they?
Not really
• What did you like about the draft? How/why did you like it? How might the author build on that section?
I liked that you used students and staff maybe include faculty too.
I liked the fact that you were just as behind as I am. It is nice to know that you aren’t the only one struggling to stay on task or put all the pieces together.
• What sections are confusing to you? How/why? Ask your classmates questions that would help you to make sense of the section.
• Where would you like to know more? Ask questions!
• Does the draft provide all the requested information listed in the assignment prompt? If not, what is it missing?
Quite a bit actually.
• Use the”Editing Proofreading Strategies” (http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/general/gl_edit.html) to focus on some content and structure elements. Try to give specific details and examples of how/why you would revise something.
• Use the same page to focus on some surface and style elements. Try to give specific details and examples of how/why you would revise something.
[...] Commented: D#7HW#6 project 3 draft [...]
First, thanks for reviewing my draft!
* Do you have any unanswered questions after you finished reading the draft? What are they?
None, that really pop out at me. I think that your draft looks like it’s on the right track.
* What did you like about the draft? How/why did you like it? How might the author build on that section?
Personally, I liked how you laid out your usability report in the Word document. I had done so before, but something went wonky with my doc file. But it’s nice to see that you took the time to do that. Also, I like the format you took with the sections that you had up.
* What sections are confusing to you? How/why? Ask your classmates questions that would help you to make sense of the section.
None of the sections were very confusing, there are just pieces that aren’t fully completed. It’s on the right track though!
* Where would you like to know more? Ask questions!
I would like to know more about your usability team, it looks like an interesting group.
* Does the draft provide all the requested information listed in the assignment prompt? If not, what is it missing?
I think all of the sections from the prompt are clearly listed.
* Use the”Editing Proofreading Strategies” (http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/general/gl_edit.html) to focus on some content and structure elements. Try to give specific details and examples of how/why you would revise something.
* Use the same page to focus on some surface and style elements. Try to give specific details and examples of how/why you would revise something.
I think with everyone’s drafts we just need to revise and rework stuff. Everything looks good here, but with some editing it could end up great! Good luck with project 3!
[...] Peer Review #1 [...]
• Do you have any unanswered questions after you finished reading the draft? What are they?
Everything seems good to me and I don’t have any questions.
• What did you like about the draft? How/why did you like it? How might the author build on that section?
In your draft the part that stood out to me was the table of contents because in my draft I didn’t have a table of contents and I liked your table of contents.
• What sections are confusing to you? How/why?
There wasn’t that much information therefore it wasn’t that confusing.
• Where would you like to know more? Ask questions!
I would like to see the final draft so there are not that many blank pages.
• Does the draft provide all the requested information listed in the assignment prompt? If not, what is it missing?
It is missing some information and those pages are blank
• Use the”Editing Proofreading Strategies” (http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/general/gl_edit.html) to focus on some content and structure elements. Try to give specific details and examples of how/why you would revise something.
There isn’t that much information to proofread and edit, and the information provide does not need any editing.
• Use the same page to focus on some surface and style elements. Try to give specific details and examples of how/why you would revise something.
There is no need for any details for revising